In Case You Missed It - North Haven Budget Update
- DTC Leadership

- Apr 17
- 3 min read
This week was an important one in North Haven’s budget process, with multiple meetings and meaningful community input shaping where things stand today. Here’s a clear summary of what happened and what it means going forward.
Monday: Budget Public Hearing
On Monday, the town held its Budget Public Hearing.
Nearly every speaker who came forward advocated for:
Restoring education funding
Restoring firefighter positions
Many members of the community, including several from the DTC, took the time to speak, share perspectives, and make it clear what matters most to them.
The message from the public was consistent:invest in education and public safety.

Wednesday: Board of Finance Actions
On Wednesday, the Board of Finance met and made several unprecedented adjustments to the proposed budget, including:
Restoring funding for 2 firefighters
Restoring $500,000 to the Board of Education budget
Making smaller adjustments across other departments
This reflects movement in response to both community input and continued dialogue between boards.

Thursday: Board of Education Response and Clarifications
At Thursday’s Board of Education meeting, the BOE:
Thanked the Board of Finance for restoring funding
Provided clarification on several key points that had been discussed publicly
Here are some of the most important clarifications:
Paraprofessionals (Paras)
There has been a claim that the district had a “buffer” for 10 additional paraprofessionals.
This is not accurate.
This likely refers to Registered Behavior Technicians (RBTs) funded through grants. These positions actually save the district hundreds of thousands of dollars and should not be interpreted as excess staffing.
Administrative Positions
There was considerable confusion around backfilling administrators. The district has experienced some turnover in administrative staffing and explained:
The Director of Facilities position remains unfilled
A High School Assistant Principal position was eliminated, with funds redirected to special education services
“Surplus” Clarification
There has also been confusion around the idea of a “surplus.”
A true surplus means all obligations are fully funded and money remains.
That is not the case here and has not been the case for a long time.
Unspent funds do not account for:
A backlog of capital needs
Underfunded insurance reserves
When those are considered, it’s clear the district has not had a true surplus in years.
Budget Vote (6.3% Increase)
There was a misleading claim that the Board of Education voted unanimously to align with the 6.3% budget set by the Board of Finance.
This was not an endorsement of the number, but a commitment to act in good faith and work within the amount provided.
At the same time, the BOE:
Clearly outlined the impact of reductions
Formally requested an additional $500,000 to reach a more sustainable level
Additional Updates
DRIP Grant: Funding will support needed repairs across buildings, including the middle school and Clintonville. This addresses safety and maintenance needs, not surplus building.
Bus Patrol Program: Now live. Residents can review details on the town website.
Food Services Audit: Completed with positive feedback.
School Calendar Updates:
Last day of school: June 17
Graduation: June 16
First day of school (2026–27): August 31
Eid al-Fitr: recognized as a day off
April break: Week of April 12, 2027

Workers’ Compensation Workers’ compensation is projected to end the year with about $35,000 remaining. The proposed budget does not rebuild this reserve, leaving little margin for unexpected costs.

Where We Go From Here
This budget still reflects difficult tradeoffs.
While progress was made this week, the conversation is not over. Community input continues to play a critical role in shaping the final outcome.
If you care about the future of our schools, public safety, and our town as a whole, now is the time to stay engaged.
Attend meetings
Ask questions
Make your voice heard
Because these decisions affect all of us.




Comments